European ASP.NET 4.5 Hosting BLOG

BLOG about ASP.NET 4, ASP.NET 4.5 Hosting and Its Technology - Dedicated to European Windows Hosting Customer

ASP.NET Core 8 Hosting - HostForLIFE.eu :: Increase your email marketing ROI by effectively tracking opens with C#

clock November 6, 2023 06:17 by author Peter

Assume you run an online store and, every month, you send a marketing email to consumers who have registered on your site highlighting the latest products from your store in order to increase sales. Your CEO, on the other hand, wants to know how many customers actually open these emails. If you can't pay third-party email tracking solutions, you can utilize the following way to see if your emails have been opened. Create an API first. If our customers open our emails, this API will record the messages they send back.

[ApiController]
[Route("api/[controller]")]
public class EmailTrackingController : Controller
{
    [HttpGet("EmailOpener")]
    public ActionResult EmailOpener(string email, string eventId)
    {
        //Your logic here to capture email & eventId
        //maybe save email and eventID to DB

        byte[] pixel = Convert.FromBase64String("R0lGODlhAQABAIAAAAAAAP///yH5BAEAAAAALAAAAAABAAEAAAIBRAA7");
        return new FileContentResult(pixel, "image/gif");
    }
}

As you can see, I've built an EmailTracking controller with a GET method called EmailOpener that takes two parameters: email and eventId.

When a customer opens your marketing email, this API is invoked, and their email address, along with the eventId, is provided to it. The email and eventId can then be captured and saved in your database. You might have noticed that I returned the encoded value "R0lGODlhAQABAIAAAAAAAP///yH5BAEAAAAALAAAAAABAAEAAAIBRAA7."

This isn't just any dummy value; it's a legitimate base64-encoded representation of a tiny transparent GIF image. Assume the short HTML text below is your marketing email for the forthcoming Black Friday Sales.

<!DOCTYPE html>
<html lang="en">
<head>
    <meta charset="UTF-8">
    <meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1.0">
    <title>Black Friday Sales</title>
</head>
<body>
    <h1>Hi, check out our Black Friday Sales!!!</h1>

    <img alt="" src="https://www.mysite.com/EmailTracking/EmailOpener?email=ENCODED_EMAIL_ADDRESS&eventId=BlackFridaySales2023" width="1" height="1" style="border: none; display: block;" />

    <!-- Main content images -->
    <img src="https://www.mysite.com/contents/image/BFD2023.PNG" alt="Black Friday Deals" />

    <!-- Dummy messages -->
    <p>Dummy Message....</p>
    <p>Dummy Message....</p>
    <p>Dummy Message....</p>
</body>
</html>

As you can see in the email, I have included the following html snippet
<img alt="" src="@Email&eventId=BlackFridaySales2023">https://www.mysite.com/EmailTracking/EmailOpener?email=@Email&eventId=BlackFridaySales2023" width="1" height="1" style="border-width: 0px; border-style: solid;" />

This is an HTML image tag with a 1x1 pixel size that contains a link to our EmailOpener API. Because of its small size, the buyer will overlook it when they read our marketing email. As you can see, I used @Email for the email field; this is a variable that will be substituted with the email address of the real recipient.

When a customer reads your email, the 1x1 pixel picture loads and the URL (in this case, "https://www.mysite.com/EmailTracking/EmailOpener?email=@Email&eventId=BlackFridaySales2023") is triggered. This enables us to determine who opened the email and for what event.

Redirect Image Clickable
Some email providers, however, automatically prevent photos from loading and only display the images if the user chooses to view or download them. If this occurs, our 1x1 pixel image will not work because our consumers will not see it in the email, let alone download it.

To avoid this problem, we can include an appealing image in the email along with a call-to-action such as 'Click the image to discover more amazing deals!' We can redirect them to our API and store their email address in our database whenever they click the image.

To help with this, I've included a new API method called RedirectCustomer.
public ActionResult RedirectCustomer(string email, string eventId)
{
    //Your logic here to capture email & eventId
    //maybe save email and eventID to DB

    if (eventId == "BlackFridaySales2023")
    {
        return Redirect("https://www.mysite.com/BFD2023LandingPage");
    }
    else {
    return Redirect("https://www.mysite.com");
    }
}

This function will record the customer's incoming email and route them to the relevant page based on the incoming eventID. If we notice an incoming client with the eventID 'BlackFridaySales2023,' for example, we'll redirect them to our Black Friday Promotions landing page.

Include the following html image element in the email you send to the customer.
<a href="https://www.mysite.com/EmailTracking/RedirectCustomer?email=@email&eventId=BlackFridaySales2023">
     <img alt="Black Friday Promotion 2023" class="fullWidth" src="https://www.mysite.com/Content/images/BFD2023.png" style="display: block; height: auto; border: 0px; max-width: 600px; width: 100%;" title="Black Friday Promotion 2023!" width="600" />
</a>

An image entitled 'BFD2023.png' will be prominently shown in the email sent to our consumers. When the customer clicks on this image, they will be taken to our API at https://www.mysite.com/EmailTracking/RedirectCustomer?email=@Email&eventId=BlackFridaySales2023. At this point, the customer's email address will be saved in our database. This information allows us to track the email open rate, which can then be examined after the offer is over to determine the campaign's reach and effectiveness.

Some Things to Think About
If you intend to service a large number of customers, you must address potential concerns such as database locks, concurrency, and server overload. It is critical to guarantee that your infrastructure can manage a high amount of incoming requests. Furthermore, further coding steps are required to manage concurrency and prevent database locking from a programming standpoint.


Tags: , ,
Categories:
Actions: E-mail | Kick it! | Permalink | commentComments (0) | RSS comment feedComment RSS

ASP.NET Core 8 Hosting - HostForLIFE.eu :: What is Middleware in ASP.NET Core

clock November 1, 2023 09:44 by author Peter

ASP.NET Core is a versatile and robust web application framework. Middleware is one of its core characteristics, and it plays a critical role in processing requests and responses as they travel through your application. This post will explain what middleware is, how it works, and why it is necessary for developing powerful online applications in ASP.NET Core.

ASP.NET Core Middleware

In ASP.NET Core, middleware is a collection of components that are added to the application's request processing pipeline. Each middleware component is responsible for processing an incoming request or an outgoing answer. Middleware components can be added, removed, or reordered, allowing developers to tailor the request-handling pipeline to the specific demands of their application.

Middleware can handle a wide range of responsibilities, including authentication, routing, caching, logging, and more. It functions similarly to a chain of building blocks, with each block performing a specified operation on the request or response before passing it on to the next middleware in the pipeline.

The Middleware Anatomy
In ASP.NET Core, middleware components are often implemented as classes with a specified signature. They accept an HTTP context containing information about the incoming request and allow them to modify the answer. This is the fundamental structure of middleware.

public class MyMiddleware
{
    private readonly RequestDelegate _next;

    public MyMiddleware(RequestDelegate next)
    {
        _next = next;
    }

    public async Task InvokeAsync(HttpContext context)
    {
        // Do something before the next middleware
        // ...

        await _next(context); // Call the next middleware in the pipeline

        // Do something after the next middleware
        // ...
    }
}

In this case, RequestDelegate represents the next middleware in the pipeline, and the InvokeAsync method provides the logic that will run before and after the next middleware.

In Use Middleware
Consider the following example, in which we wish to track the path of each incoming request.

public class LoggingMiddleware
{
    private readonly RequestDelegate _next;

    public LoggingMiddleware(RequestDelegate next)
    {
        _next = next;
    }

    public async Task InvokeAsync(HttpContext context)
    {
        // Log the request path
        Console.WriteLine($"Request to: {context.Request.Path}");

        await _next(context); // Call the next middleware in the pipeline
    }
}

We can add this middleware to the pipeline in the Startup.cs file.
public void Configure(IApplicationBuilder app)
{
    app.UseMiddleware<LoggingMiddleware>();

    // Other middleware and configuration...
}

Now, every incoming request's path will be logged before it proceeds through the pipeline.

Ordering Middleware
The order in which middleware components are added to the pipeline matters. Middleware is executed in the order it's added, from top to bottom. For example, if you want to perform authentication before routing, you should add authentication middleware before routing middleware.

public void Configure(IApplicationBuilder app)
{
    app.UseAuthentication(); // Add authentication middleware
    app.UseRouting(); // Add routing middleware

    // Other middleware and configuration...
}

Middleware is a fundamental concept in ASP.NET Core, allowing you to modularize and customize request and response processing in your web applications. By understanding how middleware works and how to leverage it effectively, you can build robust and flexible web applications that meet your specific requirements. Whether you're handling authentication, logging, or any other aspect of request processing, middleware is a powerful tool in your ASP.NET Core toolbox.


Tags: , ,
Categories:
Actions: E-mail | Kick it! | Permalink | commentComments (0) | RSS comment feedComment RSS

ASP.NET Core 8 Hosting - HostForLIFE.eu :: WaitAll and WhenAll in.NET: An Overview

clock October 24, 2023 08:52 by author Peter

Asynchronous programming has become an essential aspect of modern software development, and.NET Core (now known as.NET 5,.NET 6,.NET 7, and later.NET 8) provides strong capabilities to make asynchronous processes easier. When working with tasks, you have two fundamental methods at your disposal: WaitAll and WhenAll. These methods enable you to efficiently manage and coordinate several asynchronous operations. In this blog post, we will look at WaitAll and WhenAll in.NET Core and learn about their differences and applications.

The Fundamentals of.NET Core Asynchronous Programming
Before diving into WaitAll and WhenAll, it's critical to understand the principles of.NET Core asynchronous programming. Asynchronous operations allow your application to run numerous tasks at the same time without interrupting the main thread, which improves responsiveness and speed. You deal with tasks in.NET Core, which represent units of work that can run concurrently.

public async Task DoSomeWorkAsync()
{
    // Perform asynchronous operations
    await Task.Delay(1000); // Simulate work
    // Continue with other operations
}

WaitAll - Waiting for All Tasks to Complete
Task.WaitAll is a synchronous method that blocks the current thread until all the provided tasks have completed. It ensures that all tasks finish their execution before allowing the program to proceed further. This is particularly useful when you need to perform actions only when all tasks are done.

async Task PerformMultipleOperationFromWaitllAsync()
{
    WaitAllSample waitAllSample = new WaitAllSample();
    Task task1 = waitAllSample.DoSomeWorkAsync();
    Task task2 = waitAllSample.DoSomeOtherWorkAsync();
    Task.WaitAll(task1, task2);
    Console.WriteLine("All tasks in WaitAll are complete!");

}

Using Task, on the other hand.WaitAll can cause thread blocking and may not be appropriate in all cases, particularly in UI applications where blocking the main thread can result in a frozen interface.

WhenAll - Concurrently Awaiting All Tasks

WhenAll is an asynchronous method that returns a new task that finishes when all of the specified tasks have completed. Rather of blocking the thread, it lets the computer to continue processing other activities or managing user input, which is essential for responsive apps.

async Task PerformMultipleOperationFromWhenAllAsync()
{
    WhenAllExample whenallexample = new WhenAllExample();
    Task task3 = whenallexample.DoSomethingAsync();
    Task task4 = whenallexample.DoSomethingElseAsync();
    await Task.WhenAll(task3, task4);
    Console.WriteLine("All tasks in WhenAll are complete!");
}

Task.WhenAll is better suited for cases in which numerous asynchronous operations must be performed concurrently without blocking the main thread. It is essential for developing responsive and efficient applications.

Important distinctions between WaitAll and WhenAll
Task.WaitAll is a synchronous method that causes the current thread to be blocked, whereas Task.Because WhenAll is asynchronous, additional processes can execute concurrently.
When you wish to wait for all tasks to finish before proceeding, Task.WaitAll is useful, whereas Task.WhenAll allows you to continue performing other tasks while waiting for tasks to complete.
Task.WaitAll may cause thread-blocking, rendering it inappropriate for UI applications, whereas Task.WhenAll is better suited for responsive interfaces.
Task.WaitAll is older and is frequently used in legacy programs, whereas Task.WhenAll is the ideal and modern method of managing many tasks in.NET Core.

Conclusion
Asynchronous programming is a useful technique in.NET Core for improving application responsiveness and performance. Task.Task and WaitAll.WhenAll methods are critical for managing and coordinating several asynchronous tasks. You may make informed selections when selecting the correct strategy for your specific circumstance if you understand their distinctions and use cases. .NET Core delivers the tools you need to build efficient and responsive apps, whether you need to wait for all actions to complete synchronously or proceed with other processes simultaneously.


Tags: , ,
Categories:
Actions: E-mail | Kick it! | Permalink | commentComments (0) | RSS comment feedComment RSS

ASP.NET Core 8 Hosting - HostForLIFE.eu :: Action Filters in ASP.NET Core

clock October 16, 2023 07:01 by author Peter

ASP.NET Core is a versatile and robust web application framework. It offers a comprehensive collection of capabilities for developing strong and scalable applications, with Action Filters being one of the essential aspects that increase its functionality. Action filters allow you to execute code before or after an action method is executed, allowing you to add cross-cutting concerns to your application. In this post, we will look at action filters in ASP.NET Core, learn about their different types, and how to develop custom filters to improve the functionality of your web application.

What exactly are Action Filters?
In ASP.NET Core, action filters are properties that can be applied to controller action methods to do pre- or post-processing. They enable you to add functionality that is executed before or after action methods are invoked. Cross-cutting concerns like as logging, authentication, caching, and others can be implemented via action filters.

There are five types of action filters in ASP.NET Core.

  • Authorization Filter
  • Resource Filter
  • Action Filter
  • Result Filter
  • Exception Filter

Filter for Authorization
An authorization filter is essential for enforcing authentication and authorisation rules in your web application. Authorization filters are commonly used to guarantee that only authenticated and authorized users have access to certain areas of your application. These filters are run before the action method, allowing you to validate the user's credentials and permissions before granting or denying access. They are an important part of implementing security and access control in ASP.NET Core applications.

Example
Assume you have a controller with an action method to which you wish to limit access based on user roles. In this scenario, we'll use an Authorization Filter to determine whether or not the user has a specified role before granting access to the action method.

First, define a custom Authorization Filter.
using Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvc;
using Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvc.Filters;
using Microsoft.AspNetCore.Http;
using System;

public class CustomAuthorizationFilter : Attribute, IAuthorizationFilter
{
public void OnAuthorization(AuthorizationFilterContext context)
{
    // Check if the user is in the "Admin" role
    if (!context.HttpContext.User.IsInRole("Admin"))
    {
        // If not, deny access and return a forbidden status
        context.Result = new StatusCodeResult(StatusCodes.Status403Forbidden);
    }
}
}

Next, apply the CustomAuthorizationFilter to your action method.
[CustomAuthorizationFilter] // Apply the custom authorization filter
public IActionResult AdminOnlyAction()
{
// This action is only accessible to users in the "Admin" role
return View();
}

In this example, the CustomAuthorizationFilter is applied to the AdminOnlyAction method. When a user tries to access this action, the filter checks if they are in the "Admin" role using the IsInRole method. If the user is not in the "Admin" role, the filter sets the HTTP response status code to 403 Forbidden, denying access to the action.

Resource Filter
Resource Filters in ASP.NET Core are a type of action filter that allows you to perform actions that affect the entire HTTP request and response, such as modifying response headers or handling global exceptions. These filters execute before any other filter type (Authorization, Action, Result, and Exception filters) have access to the HTTP context and can influence the entire request processing pipeline.

  • Global Exception Handling: Resource filters can be used to handle exceptions that occur during the request processing pipeline. By implementing a resource filter for exception handling, you can catch and handle exceptions globally, providing a consistent way to log errors, display custom error pages, or perform other actions.
  • Response Modification: You can modify the response object, such as adding custom response headers, changing the status code, or altering the response content, using resource filters.
  • Request Preprocessing: Resource filters can perform actions at the beginning of the request pipeline, such as setting request-specific variables or performing other pre-processing tasks.
  • Global Logging: You can use resource filters for global logging to log information about incoming requests, response times, or other metrics that apply to the entire application.

Example
Let's create a simple resource filter that adds a custom response header to every response in your ASP.NET Core application. In this example, we'll add a "X-Custom-Header" to the response.

Create a custom resource filter.
using Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvc.Filters;

public class AddCustomHeaderResourceFilter : IResourceFilter
{
public void OnResourceExecuting(ResourceExecutingContext context)
{
    // Code to execute before the action
    context.HttpContext.Response.Headers.Add("X-Custom-Header", "MyCustomValue");
}

public void OnResourceExecuted(ResourceExecutedContext context)
{
    // Code to execute after the action
}
}

You can do this in the ConfigureServices method.
services.AddMvc(options =>
{
options.Filters.Add<AddCustomHeaderResourceFilter>();
});

Now, this resource filter will be executed for every request in your ASP.NET Core application, and it will add the "X-Custom-Header" to the response headers.

Resource filters are a powerful way to perform global actions that apply to all requests and responses in your application, making them a valuable tool for tasks like global exception handling, response modification, and request preprocessing.

Action Filter
Action Filters in ASP.NET Core are attributes that allow you to add logic that runs before and after the execution of individual action methods in your controllers. These filters are used to perform tasks such as logging, input validation, modifying the action result, and more.

Example
Let's create a simple Action Filter to log the start and end of an action method.

Create a custom Action Filter.
using Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvc.Filters;
using Microsoft.Extensions.Logging;

public class LogActionFilter : IActionFilter
{
private readonly ILogger<LogActionFilter> _logger;

public LogActionFilter(ILogger<LogActionFilter> logger)
{
    _logger = logger;
}

public void OnActionExecuting(ActionExecutingContext context)
{
    // This method runs before the action method
    _logger.LogInformation($"Action '{context.ActionDescriptor.DisplayName}' is starting.");
}

public void OnActionExecuted(ActionExecutedContext context)
{
    // This method runs after the action method
    _logger.LogInformation($"Action '{context.ActionDescriptor.DisplayName}' has completed.");
}
}

You can do this in the ConfigureServices method.
services.AddMvc(options =>
{
options.Filters.Add<LogActionFilter>();
});

Apply the Action Filter to a controller action method.
[ServiceFilter(typeof(LogActionFilter))] // Apply the filter to this action method
public IActionResult MyAction()
{
// Your action method logic
}

Now, whenever you call the MyAction method, the LogActionFilter will log the start and end of the action, providing you with a simple way to monitor the execution of your action methods.

Result Filter
Result Filters in ASP.NET Core are a type of action filter that executes code after an action method has been executed but before the result is processed and sent to the client. These filters are useful for modifying the response or result, adding custom headers, or performing actions related to the response before it is returned to the client.

Example
Let's create a simple Result Filter to add a custom header to the response.

Create a custom Result Filter.
using Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvc.Filters;

public class AddCustomHeaderResultFilter : IResultFilter
{
public void OnResultExecuting(ResultExecutingContext context)
{
    // This method runs before the result is executed
    context.HttpContext.Response.Headers.Add("X-Custom-Header", "MyCustomValue");
}

public void OnResultExecuted(ResultExecutedContext context)
{
    // This method runs after the result is executed
}
}

You can do this in the ConfigureServices method.
services.AddMvc(options =>
{
options.Filters.Add<AddCustomHeaderResultFilter>();
});

Apply the Result Filter to a controller action method.
[ServiceFilter(typeof(AddCustomHeaderResultFilter))] // Apply the filter to this action method
public IActionResult MyAction()
{
// Your action method logic
}

When you call the MyAction method, the AddCustomHeaderResultFilter will add the "X-Custom-Header" to the response headers before it's sent to the client. This can be useful for scenarios where you want to add custom response headers, set response content types, or perform other response-related actions.

Exception Filter
Exception Filters in ASP.NET Core are a type of action filter that are specifically designed to handle exceptions that occur during the execution of an action method. These filters allow you to define custom logic to gracefully handle and respond to exceptions, providing a way to centralize error handling and improve the user experience.

How Exception Filters Work?
Exception filters are executed when an unhandled exception is thrown during the execution of an action method. They intercept the exception before it propagates up the call stack and provide an opportunity to perform custom error handling.
Use Cases for Exception Filters

Custom Error Pages: Exception filters can redirect the user to custom error pages, displaying user-friendly error messages instead of the default error page.
Logging and Reporting: You can use exception filters to log exceptions, making it easier to identify and fix issues. You can also report exceptions to external systems for further analysis.
Graceful Degradation: In cases where an exception occurs but the application can still function to some extent, an exception filter can handle the error and return a partial or degraded response instead of a complete failure.

Example
Let's create a simple Exception Filter to log and handle exceptions.

Create a custom Exception Filter.
using Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvc.Filters;
using Microsoft.Extensions.Logging;

public class CustomExceptionFilter : IExceptionFilter
{
private readonly ILogger<CustomExceptionFilter> _logger;

public CustomExceptionFilter(ILogger<CustomExceptionFilter> logger)
{
    _logger = logger;
}

public void OnException(ExceptionContext context)
{
    // Log the exception
    _logger.LogError($"An exception occurred: {context.Exception.Message}");

    // Handle the exception
    context.Result = new ViewResult { ViewName = "Error" };
    context.ExceptionHandled = true;
}
}

You can do this in the ConfigureServices method.
services.AddMvc(options =>
{
options.Filters.Add<CustomExceptionFilter>();
});

Apply the Exception Filter to a controller action method.
[ServiceFilter(typeof(CustomExceptionFilter))] // Apply the filter to this action method
public IActionResult MyAction()
{
// Your action method logic
}

If an unhandled exception occurs in the MyAction method, the CustomExceptionFilter will log the error and redirect the user to a custom error page.

Real-World Use Cases
Action filters are incredibly versatile and can be applied to a wide range of scenarios. Here are some real-world use cases for action filters in ASP.NET Core.

  • Logging: You can create an action filter that logs information about the execution of action methods, helping with debugging and monitoring.
  • Validation: Implement input validation checks before an action method is executed to ensure that the input data is valid.
  • Caching: Use action filters to cache the results of action methods to improve performance and reduce database or API calls.
  • Security: Implement security checks and authorization logic using action filters to restrict access to certain action methods based on user roles and permissions.
  • Exception Handling: Create custom exception filters to handle and log exceptions in a consistent and user-friendly manner.



Tags: , ,
Categories:
Actions: E-mail | Kick it! | Permalink | commentComments (0) | RSS comment feedComment RSS

ASP.NET Core 8 Hosting - HostForLIFE.eu :: Exploring Performance with BenchmarkDotNet in .NET

clock October 10, 2023 08:02 by author Peter

Optimization of performance is an important part of software development. As developers, we frequently attempt to write code that is efficient and speedy. However, precisely assessing code performance can be difficult. This is where BenchmarkDotNet, a powerful.NET benchmarking library, comes in. In this post, we'll look at the capabilities of BenchmarkDotNet and show you how to use it to test your.NET programs.

What exactly is BenchmarkDotNet?
BenchmarkDotNet is an open-source.NET benchmarking library. It enables developers to create, execute, and evaluate benchmarks in order to assess the performance of their programs. BenchmarkDotNet is a vital tool for optimizing.NET applications since it provides precise measurements, many run modes, and statistical analysis.

Starting Over
Before we begin benchmarking, please confirm that BenchmarkDotNet is installed in your project. You may install it with the following command in the NuGet Package Manager Console:
dotnet add package BenchmarkDotNet

Creating Your First BenchmarkLet's create a simple benchmark to compare the performance of two different implementations of a function. Consider the following example where we want to find the factorial of a number. Now you create the ConsoleApp.

Create a Class name FactorialCalculator

public class FactorialCalculator
{
    public int CalculateRecursive(int n)
    {
        if (n == 0 || n == 1)
        {
            return 1;
        }
        return n * CalculateRecursive(n - 1);
    }

    public int CalculateIterative(int n)
    {
        int result = 1;
        for (int i = 1; i <= n; i++)
        {
            result *= i;
        }
        return result;
    }
}

Let's use BenchmarkDotNet to create benchmarks for these methods and measure their performance.
using BenchmarkDotNet.Attributes;
using BenchmarkDotNet.Running;
using ConsoleApp2;

class Program
{
static void Main(string[] args)
{
    var summary = BenchmarkRunner.Run<FactorialBenchmarks>();
}
}

public class FactorialBenchmarks
{
private readonly FactorialCalculator _calculator = new FactorialCalculator();

[Benchmark]
public void RecursiveBenchmark()
{
    _calculator.CalculateRecursive(10);
}

[Benchmark]
public void IterativeBenchmark()
{
    _calculator.CalculateIterative(10);
}
}

In this example, we've created two benchmarks, RecursiveBenchmark and IterativeBenchmark, using the Benchmark attribute. The BenchmarkRunner.Run method triggers the benchmarks and generates a detailed report.
Running Benchmarks

Build in RELEASE Mode

  • Open a terminal or command prompt.
  • Navigate to the project directory using the cd command.

Run the following command to build the project in RELEASE mode:

Run Benchmarks
After building the project in RELEASE mode, you can run your benchmarks using the dotnet run command.
When building your project, it is crucial to do so in RELEASE mode in order to guarantee that the compiler applies optimizations. This will lead to more precise benchmark results. By following this suggestion, you can avoid receiving warning messages and anticipate dependable performance measurements for your benchmarks.
When you have run it then you see

It may take some time for the results to display after running the application.


It may take some time for the results to display after running the application.

  • WorkloadPilot is the code you want to measure.
  • OverheadWarmup and OverheadActual account for the time and resources consumed by BenchmarkDotNet itself.
  • WorkloadWarmup measures the time it takes for your code to stabilize during the warm-up phase.
  • WorkloadActual measures the actual performance of your code once it has reached a stable state.

Result Summary Section

The two methods we're evaluating are listed in the overview section, along with their performance metrics. The mean measure, which is the average time it takes to run each procedure, is the most essential metric.

Conclusion
BenchmarkDotNet streamlines the process of measuring performance in.NET applications. It enables developers to find bottlenecks and improve their code effectively by delivering reliable data and statistical analysis. Consider incorporating BenchmarkDotNet into your workflow as you continue to develop high-performance applications to guarantee your code runs as efficiently as possible.


Tags: , ,
Categories:
Actions: E-mail | Kick it! | Permalink | commentComments (0) | RSS comment feedComment RSS

ASP.NET Core 8 Hosting - HostForLIFE.eu :: Circuit Breaker in .NET Core

clock October 6, 2023 07:12 by author Peter

A circuit breaker is a software development design pattern intended to improve the resilience and fault tolerance of programs that connect with external services or resources. It takes its name from its electrical counterpart, which is intended to safeguard an electrical circuit from harm caused by high current. A circuit breaker in software performs a similar function by preventing the application from continually attempting to call a malfunctioning service or resource, which might lead to performance deterioration and other issues.

Circuit Breaker Diagram
Here's a breakdown of the circuit breaker pattern.

1. Normal Operation (Closed State)

    When the circuit breaker is closed, requests can travel through normally.
    It tracks the success and failure of these queries during this condition.
    When a particular number of failures are reached, the circuit breaker switches to the open position.

2. Unavailable State (Service)

    When the circuit breaker is open, it prevents requests from reaching the failing service or resource.
    This condition is activated when a preset number of failures is exceeded.
    No requests are sent to the service/resource while it is open, which might minimize the stress on the resource.
    The circuit breaker verifies if the service/resource has recovered on a regular basis by allowing a restricted number of test requests to get through.

3. Half-Open State (Service Availability Testing)

    After a predetermined period of time, the circuit breaker switches to the half-open position.
    In this condition, only a limited number of test requests can be sent to the service/resource to see if it has recovered.
    If these test requests are successful, the circuit breaker returns to the closed position.
    If the test requests continue to fail, the circuit breaker returns to the open position, protecting the system from additional failures.

Important Concepts

  • Circuit breakers have thresholds that determine when they switch between states. The number of successive failures, the failure rate, or a combination of factors could be used to set these criteria.
  • Timers: Timers regulate how long the circuit breaker stays in each state. For example, it may remain in the open state for a predetermined period of time before shifting to the half-open state.
  • Monitoring and request tracking are required to determine the health of the service or resource and to determine when to open or close the circuit.
  • Fallback Mechanism: While in the open state, apps can design fallback mechanisms to provide alternative functionality or smooth service degradation.
  • Automated Recovery: When the service/resource appears to have recovered, circuit breakers automatically return to the closed state, decreasing the impact on the system.

By isolating problematic services or resources, the circuit breaker design helps to prevent cascading failures in distributed systems, enhances system stability, and provides a level of fault tolerance. It is a basic idea in the development of strong and resilient software systems.

Circuit Breaker Pattern in .Net Core
Let's implement the same in .Net Core using two different approaches.

  • Approach 1 - Without using any specific Nuget package
  • Approach 2 - Using Polly Nuget package

Common steps for both approaches( will also upload the solution with this article). I am using Visual Studio for mac but you can use Visual Studio code as well.

Create a new .NET Core API Project
Add a new interface for service and the concrete service class with HttpClient as a dependency
In the concrete service, add code to make an HttpRequest to a random api and get request. I am using an open source webapi for getting random jokes
Add a controller and call the above created service in it

Joke Interface
namespace CircuitBreaker
{
    public interface IJokeService
    {
        public Task<string> GetRandomJokes();
    }
}

Joke Service
namespace CircuitBreaker
{
    public class JokeService : IJokeService
    {
        private readonly HttpClient _httpClient;

        public JokeService(HttpClient httpClient)
        {
            _httpClient = httpClient;
        }

        public async Task<string> GetRandomJokes()
        {
            try
            {
                var request = new HttpRequestMessage
                {
                    Method = HttpMethod.Get,
                    RequestUri = new Uri("https://official-joke-api.appspot.com/random_joke")
                };
                var response = await _httpClient.SendAsync(request);
                response.EnsureSuccessStatusCode();

                var responseBody = await response.Content.ReadAsStringAsync();
                return responseBody;
            }
            catch (Exception ex)
            {
                throw ex;
            }
        }
    }
}

Joke Controller
using Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvc;

namespace CircuitBreaker.Controllers
{
    [ApiController]
    [Route("[controller]")]
    public class JokeController : ControllerBase
    {
        public readonly IJokeService _jokeService;

        public JokeController(IJokeService jokeService)
        {
            _jokeService = jokeService;
        }

        [HttpGet(Name ="GetRandomeJokes")]
        public async Task<IActionResult> Get()
        {
            try
            {
                var response = await _jokeService.GetRandomJokes();
                return Ok(response);
            }
            catch (Exception ex)
            {
                throw ex;
            }
        }
    }
}

Program.cs/StartUp.cs
public static void ConfigureService(IServiceCollection services)
{
    services.AddHttpClient<IJokeService, JokeService>();
}

Sample output
{"type":"general","setup":"What's brown and sticky?","punchline":"A stick.","id":271}

Now, the circuit breaker strategy usually allows an n number of failed tries before not-allowing any futher requests and breaking the circuite for some time. These n tries are with state, let me explain in more clarity.

Let's suppose the n count is 3 and 3 three different users tries to access the api one after the other(irrespective of the time difference between these requests) and if all three of these fails, then the 4th atempt should not even go through. The code should not further try to hit the other api untill a specifc time internal. Uptill this time interval, all requests attempts will just by-pass the api call and provide a message to end-user to try after some time. This can go in a loop if the other api issue is not resolved. This helps in making sure that the other service that we are calling is not overwhelmed with failing requests.

Let's try to implement this in Approach 1.

Create some static variables. We are creating them static as we want to persist the value of them between different calls. Please read comments for more understanding of each of it's use
//count of failed attempts that have been made
private static int attemptCount = 0;

//count of failed attempts allowed, post which the circiut will break
private static int maxAttemptCount = 3;

//flag to represent if the circuit is open or close
private static bool isCircuitOpen = false;

//field to keep a track of the utc time when the circuit was opened/broken
private static DateTime circuitOpenStartTime = DateTime.MinValue;

//the timestamp (in millisecond) for which the circuit should remain open and api call attempts should not be made
private static int circuitBreakerTimeSpanMilliseconds = 120000;

//method to start the circuit breaker
//if sets the isCircuitOpen to true and sets the time when the circuit was broken in utc
private void RecordCircuitBreakerStart()
{
    circuitOpenStartTime = DateTime.UtcNow;
    isCircuitOpen = true;
}

//method to end the circuit breaker
private void RecordCircuitBreakerEnd()
{
    circuitOpenStartTime = DateTime.MinValue;
    isCircuitOpen = false;
    attemptCount = 0;
}

//check if currently the circuit is broken or not
private void CheckIfCircuitBreakerTimeStampIsComplete()
{
    if(isCircuitOpen == true && circuitOpenStartTime.AddMilliseconds(circuitBreakerTimeSpanMilliseconds) < DateTime.UtcNow)
    {
        RecordCircuitBreakerEnd();
     }
}

Now, let's call the above method in our controller method
public async Task<string> GetRandomJokes()
{
    try
    {
        //check if the circuit was earlier open can can be closed now
        CheckIfCircuitBreakerTimeStampIsComplete();
        if (isCircuitOpen == false)
        {
            #region MakeAPICall
            var request = new HttpRequestMessage
            {
                Method = HttpMethod.Get,
                RequestUri = new Uri("https://official-joke-api.appspot.com/random_joke")
            };
            var response = await _httpClient.SendAsync(request);
            response.EnsureSuccessStatusCode();

            var responseBody = await response.Content.ReadAsStringAsync();
            return responseBody;

            #endregion
        }
        return "Service is not available. Please try after some time";
    }
    catch (Exception ex)
    {

        //in case of exception, if the max attempt of failure is not yet reached, then increase the counter
        if(isCircuitOpen == false && attemptCount < maxAttemptCount)
        {
            attemptCount++;
        }
        //if the count of max attempt if reached, then open the circuits and retuen message that the service is not available
        if(attemptCount == maxAttemptCount)
        {
            if (isCircuitOpen == false)
            {
                RecordCircuitBreakerStart();
            }
            return "Service is not reachable. Please try after some time";
        }
        return ex.Message;
    }
}

I agree with what you all must be thinking, the above approach is indeed messy and prone to more errors as we are managing multiple things at the same time. In order to make this code more readable and less error prone, we move to Approach 2

Approach 2 - In this we use an existing Nuget package, called Polly to achieve the same.

In the above code, add the nuget package Polly as in the screenshot below:

Add another nuget package - Microsoft.Extensions.Http.Polly to the solution
These packages enable us to define different policies to come into effect in case of an error. One of such policy is CircuitBreaker. Other policies to look at are RetryPolicy and WaitAndRetryPolicy.

For this, we will be adding another interface method and another service method called GetRandomJokesV2().

namespace CircuitBreaker
{
    public interface IJokeService
    {
        public Task<string> GetRandomJokes();
        public Task<string> GetRandomJokesV2();
    }
}

public async Task<string> GetRandomJokesV2()
{

    try
    {
            var request = new HttpRequestMessage
            {
                Method = HttpMethod.Get,
                RequestUri = new Uri("https://official-joke-api.appspot.com/random_joke")
            };
            var response = await _httpClient.SendAsync(request);
            response.EnsureSuccessStatusCode();

            var responseBody = await response.Content.ReadAsStringAsync();
            return responseBody;
    }

    catch (BrokenCircuitException ex)
    {

        return $"Request failed due to opened circuit: {ex.Message}";
    }
    catch (HttpRequestException httpEx)
    {
        return $"Request failed. StatusCode={httpEx.StatusCode} Message={httpEx.Message}";
    }
}

We then updated the ConfigureService method in Program.cs to add this policy. See code below:

public static void ConfigureService(IServiceCollection services)
{
    services.AddHttpClient<IJokeService, JokeService>(client =>
    {
        client.BaseAddress = new Uri("https://official-joke-api.appspot.com/random_joke");
    }).AddTransientHttpErrorPolicy(policy => policy.CircuitBreakerAsync(3, TimeSpan.FromMilliseconds(120000)));
}

In the above code, we are telling the middleware that in case this api call fails after 3 attempts, then by-pass all future api calls for 120000 miliseconds(2 mins). Post that there will be attempts to hit the api.

The way we call it in the Controller or servide does not change much
using System;
using System.Collections.Generic;
using System.Linq;
using System.Threading.Tasks;
using Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvc;

// For more information on enabling MVC for empty projects, visit https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkID=397860

namespace CircuitBreaker.Controllers
{
    [ApiController]
    [Route("[controller]")]
    public class JokeV2Controller : ControllerBase
    {
        public readonly IJokeService _jokeService;

        public JokeV2Controller(IJokeService jokeService)
        {
            _jokeService = jokeService;
        }

        [HttpGet(Name = "GetRandomeJokesV2")]
        public async Task<IActionResult> Get()
        {
            try
            {
                var response = await _jokeService.GetRandomJokesV2();
                return Ok(response);
            }
            catch (Exception ex)
            {
                throw ex;
            }
        }
    }
}

We can clearly see that the Approach 2 is a more advisable and enterprise approach which makes our code more readable and less prone to errors. We can also make all the policies inside another folders as classes and inject them wherever required. This will make our code more abstract.

Please let me know your thoughts on this. I am also attaching my solutions in this post.


Tags: , ,
Categories:
Actions: E-mail | Kick it! | Permalink | commentComments (0) | RSS comment feedComment RSS

ASP.NET Core 8 Hosting - HostForLIFE.eu :: Exploring the Art of Middleware Development in.NET Core

clock September 18, 2023 07:24 by author Peter

Middleware is the unsung hero of ASP.NET Core apps. It is critical in processing HTTP requests and responses, allowing developers to shape the flow of data in a flexible and orderly manner. In this post, we will take a tour through the diverse terrain of designing middleware in.NET Core, demonstrating real-time examples for a better understanding.


The Middleware Landscape
Middleware in ASP.NET Core serves as a link between the web server and your application. It has the ability to intercept, modify, or even short-circuit the request-response flow. Understanding the various methods for creating middleware is vital for developing powerful web applications.

1. Inline Middleware
The simplest way to create middleware is by defining it inline within the Configure method of your Startup class. Let's consider an example where we want to log incoming requests:
public void Configure(IApplicationBuilder app, IWebHostEnvironment env)
{
    app.Use(async (context, next) =>
    {
        // Log the incoming request
        LogRequest(context.Request);
        await next.Invoke();
        // Log the response
        LogResponse(context.Response);
    });
    // Other middleware and app configuration
}

This inline middleware logs both the request and response details for every incoming request.

2. Class-based Middleware
For more organized and reusable middleware, you can create custom middleware classes. Here's an example of a custom middleware class that performs authentication:

public class AuthenticationMiddleware
{
    private readonly RequestDelegate _next;
    public AuthenticationMiddleware(RequestDelegate next)
    {
        _next = next;
    }
    public async Task InvokeAsync(HttpContext context)
    {
        // Perform authentication logic
        if (!context.User.Identity.IsAuthenticated)
        {
            context.Response.StatusCode = 401;
            return;
        }
        await _next(context);
    }
}

In the Startup class, register and use this middleware:

public void Configure(IApplicationBuilder app, IWebHostEnvironment env)
{
    app.UseMiddleware<AuthenticationMiddleware>();
    // Other middleware and app configuration
}

3. Middleware Extension Methods
To keep your Startup class clean, you can create extension methods for middleware. Continuing with the authentication example, here's how you can create an extension method:
public static class AuthenticationMiddlewareExtensions
{
    public static IApplicationBuilder UseAuthenticationMiddleware(this IApplicationBuilder app)
    {
        return app.UseMiddleware<AuthenticationMiddleware>();
    }
}

Now, in your Startup class, using this extension method is as simple as:
public void Configure(IApplicationBuilder app, IWebHostEnvironment env)
{
    app.UseAuthenticationMiddleware();
    // Other middleware and app configuration
}

4. Middleware Pipeline Ordering
Order matters in middleware. The sequence in which you add middleware components to the pipeline affects their execution. For instance, if you have middleware that handles error responses, it should be placed after other middleware to catch exceptions.
public void Configure(IApplicationBuilder app, IWebHostEnvironment env)
{
    app.UseExceptionHandler("/Home/Error");  // Error handling middleware
    // Other middleware and app configuration
}

Summary
Middleware is a fundamental part of building robust ASP.NET Core applications. Knowing the various ways to create middleware, from inline methods to class-based and extension methods, empowers you to structure your application's request-response pipeline effectively. By understanding the order of execution in the middleware pipeline, you can ensure that each component plays its role at the right moment. As you continue your journey in ASP.NET Core development, mastering middleware creation will be a valuable skill in your toolkit, enabling you to craft efficient and resilient web applications.


Tags: , ,
Categories:
Actions: E-mail | Kick it! | Permalink | commentComments (0) | RSS comment feedComment RSS

ASP.NET Core 8 Hosting - HostForLIFE.eu :: How to Generate PDF Documents in .NET C# ?

clock September 11, 2023 07:59 by author Peter

Many applications demand the ability to generate PDF documents programmatically. GrapeCity's GcPdf is a comprehensive library in the.NET ecosystem that allows developers to easily generate, change, and manipulate PDF documents. This blog post will show you how to utilize GcPdf to generate PDF documents programmatically in.NET C#, with actual examples to back it up.

What exactly is GcPdf?
GcPdf is a.NET package that offers extensive PDF document production and manipulation features. It has a variety of features, including:

  • Creating PDF documents from the ground up.
  • Text, photos, and shapes can be added to PDF pages.
  • Changing fonts and styles.
  • Making tables and graphs.
  • Inserting links and bookmarks.
  • Exporting PDFs to various formats.
  • Password protection and encryption are being added as security measures.


Let's get started with GcPdf by creating a simple PDF document.

How to Begin with GcPdf?
Make sure you have Visual Studio or your favourite C# development environment installed before we begin. In addition, you must include the GrapeCity Documents for PDF NuGet package (GcPdf) in your project.

Making a Basic PDF Document
In this example, we'll make a simple PDF file with text and a rectangle shape.

using System;
using GrapeCity.Documents.Pdf;
using GrapeCity.Documents.Text;

class Program
{
    static void Main(string[] args)
    {
        // Create a new PDF document
        var doc = new GcPdfDocument();

        // Add a page to the document
        var page = doc.NewPage();

        // Create a graphics object for drawing on the page
        var g = page.Graphics;

        // Add content to the page
        var text = "Hello, World!";
        var font = StandardFonts.Helvetica;
        var fontSize = 24;
        var textFormat = new TextFormat()
        {
            Font = font,
            FontSize = fontSize,
        };

        g.DrawString(text, textFormat, new PointF(100, 100));

        // Create a rectangle
        var rect = new RectangleF(100, 200, 200, 150);
        g.DrawRectangle(rect, Color.Red);

        // Specify the file path where you want to save the PDF
        var filePath = "example.pdf";

        // Save the document to a PDF file
        doc.Save(filePath);

        Console.WriteLine($"PDF created at {filePath}");
    }
}

Explanation of the code

  • To represent the PDF document, we construct a new GcPdfDocument object.
  • Using doc, add a page to the document.NewPage().
  • Make a graphics object (g) to doodle on the page.
  • Using g, add text and a rectangle to the page.DrawString() and g.DrawRectangle() are two functions.
  • Enter the location to the file where you wish to save the PDF.
  • doc Save the document as a PDF file.Save().

After running this code, a PDF file named "example.pdf" will be created in your project directory.

GcPdf Advanced Features
GcPdf has a wide range of tools for creating advanced PDF documents. Here are a few advanced features to look into:

Including Images
Using the g.DrawImage() method, you can add images to your PDF document. This enables you to insert logos, images, or photographs in your documents.

var image = Image.FromFile("logo.png");
g.DrawImage(image, new RectangleF(50, 50, 100, 100));

Making Tables
Tables are widely used to present tabular data in PDF documents. GcPdf includes a Table class that may be used to create tables with a variety of formatting choices.

var table = new Table();
table.DataSource = GetTableData(); // Replace with your data source
page.Elements.Add(table);

Adding Hyperlinks
You can include hyperlinks in your PDFs using the g.DrawString() method with a link destination.
var hyperlinkText = "Visit our website";
var linkDestination = new LinkDestinationURI("https://example.com");
g.DrawString(hyperlinkText, textFormat, new PointF(100, 300), linkDestination);

PDF Security
GcPdf allows you to secure your PDFs by adding passwords or encrypting them. You can set document permissions and control who can view or edit the document.
var options = new PdfSaveOptions
{
    Security = new PdfSecuritySettings
    {
        OwnerPassword = "owner_password",
        UserPassword = "user_password",
        Permissions = PdfPermissions.Print | PdfPermissions.Copy,
    },
};
doc.Save("secure.pdf", options);

Creating customized PDFs for various applications in .NET C# by using GcPdf programmatically is a potent and versatile method. GcPdf offers all the necessary features and flexibility to generate reports, invoices, or other types of documents quickly and efficiently. To enhance your PDF generation capabilities with more in-depth information and examples, please refer to the GcPdf documentation. We wish you happy coding!


Tags: , ,
Categories: ASP.NET Core 8 Hosting
Actions: E-mail | Kick it! | Permalink | commentComments (0) | RSS comment feedComment RSS

ASP.NET Core 8 Hosting - HostForLIFE.eu :: Swagger/OpenAPI API documentation in ASP.NET Core Web API

clock September 4, 2023 08:18 by author Peter

Using tools like Swagger/OpenAPI or NSwag to create thorough API documentation for an ASP.NET Core Web API is a critical step in ensuring that your API is well-documented and easy for other developers to understand and utilize. I'll show you how to build API documentation in an ASP.NET Core Web API project using Swagger/OpenAPI in the steps below.

Step 1: Begin by creating an ASP.NET Core Web API Project.
If you do not already have an ASP.NET Core Web API project, you can build one by following the instructions below.

    Start Visual Studio or your favorite code editor.
    Make a new project and select "ASP.NET Core Web Application."
    Choose the "API" template and press "Create."

Step 2: Set up Swashbuckle.AspNetCore
Swashbuckle.AspNetCore is a library that makes integrating Swagger/OpenAPI into your ASP.NET Core Web API project easier. It may be installed using NuGet Package Manager or the.NET CLI.

dotnet add package Swashbuckle.AspNetCore

Step 3. Configure Swagger/OpenAPI
In your Startup.cs file, configure Swagger/OpenAPI in the ConfigureServices and Configure methods.
using Microsoft.OpenApi.Models;
using Swashbuckle.AspNetCore.SwaggerGen;
using Swashbuckle.AspNetCore.SwaggerUI;

Author: Sardar Mudassar Ali Khan
public void ConfigureServices(IServiceCollection services)
{
    services.AddSwaggerGen(c =>
    {
        c.SwaggerDoc("v1", new OpenApiInfo
        {
            Title = "Auth API",
            Version = "v1",
            Description = "Description of your API",
        });
        var xmlFile = $"{Assembly.GetExecutingAssembly().GetName().Name}.xml";
        var xmlPath = Path.Combine(AppContext.BaseDirectory, xmlFile);
        c.IncludeXmlComments(xmlPath);
    });

}

public void Configure(IApplicationBuilder app, IWebHostEnvironment env)
{

    app.UseSwagger();
    app.UseSwaggerUI(c =>
    {
        c.SwaggerEndpoint("/swagger/v1/swagger.json", "Auth API");
        c.RoutePrefix = "api-docs"; // You can change the URL path as needed.
    });

}

Step 4. Add XML Comments
For Swagger to provide descriptions and summaries for your API endpoints, you should add XML comments to your controller methods. To enable XML documentation, go to your project's properties and enable the "Generate XML documentation file" option.

Then, add comments to your controller methods like this:
using Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvc;
using System.Collections.Generic;
using YourNamespace.Models; // Replace with your model namespace
using Microsoft.EntityFrameworkCore;

Author: Peter
[ApiController]
[Route("api/items")]
public class ItemsController : ControllerBase
{
    private readonly YourDbContext _context; // Replace with your DbContext type

    public ItemsController(YourDbContext context)
    {
        _context = context;
    }

    [HttpGet]
    public IActionResult GetItems()
    {
        try
        {
            var items = _context.Items.ToList(); // Assuming "Items" is your DbSet

            if (items == null || items.Count == 0)
            {
                return NoContent(); // Return 204 No Content if no items are found.
            }

            return Ok(items); // Return 200 OK with the list of items.
        }
        catch (Exception ex)
        {
            // Log the exception or handle it accordingly.
            return StatusCode(500, "Internal Server Error"); // Return a 500 Internal Server Error status.
        }
    }
}

Step 5. Run Your API and Access Swagger UI
Build and run your ASP.NET Core Web API project. You can access the Swagger UI by navigating to /api-docs/index.html (or the path you configured in Startup.cs) in your web browser. You should see the API documentation generated by Swagger/OpenAPI.

Now, your ASP.NET Core Web API has comprehensive API documentation generated using Swagger/OpenAPI. Developers can use this documentation to understand and interact with your API effectively.


Tags: , ,
Categories:
Actions: E-mail | Kick it! | Permalink | commentComments (0) | RSS comment feedComment RSS

ASP.NET Core 8 Hosting - HostForLIFE.eu :: Mastering Dependency Injection and Third-Party IoC Integration

clock August 30, 2023 08:45 by author Peter

Dependency Injection (DI) is a design pattern used in software development to establish loosely linked components by allowing dependencies to be injected into a class rather than created within it. This improves code reuse, testability, and maintainability. An Inversion of Control (IoC) container is a tool that manages dependency injection in the context of Dependency Injection.

Step 1: Begin by creating an ASP.NET Core Web API Project.
Launch Visual Studio.
Make a new project in ASP.NET Core Web Application.
Select the API template and make sure ASP.NET Core 3.1 or later is chosen.
Step 2: Establish Dependencies
Assume you wish to build a basic service to manage articles. Here's an example of how you might define your dependencies:
Create the service's interface.

Author: Peter
public interface IArticleService
{
    List<Article> GetAllArticles();
    Article GetArticleById(int id);
}

Implement the service
Author: Peter

public class ArticleService: IArticleService
{
    private List<Article> _articles = new List<Article>
    {
        new Article { Id = 1, Title = "Introduction to Dependency Injection By Peter
        Khan", Content = "..." },
        new Article { Id = 2, Title = "ASP.NET Core Web API Basics", Content = "..." }
    };

    public List<Article> GetAllArticles()
    {
        return _articles;
    }

    public Article GetArticleById(int id)
    {
        return _articles.FirstOrDefault(article => article.Id == id);
    }
}

Step 2. Configure Dependency Injection
In your Startup.cs file, configure the dependency injection container:
public void ConfigureServices(IServiceCollection services)
{
    services.AddControllers();

    // Register the ArticleService
    services.AddScoped<IArticleService, ArticleService>();
}

Step 3. Create Controller
Create a controller that uses the IArticleService:
[Route("api/[controller]")]
[ApiController]
public class ArticlesController : ControllerBase
{
    private readonly IArticleService _articleService;

    public ArticlesController(IArticleService articleService)
    {
        _articleService = articleService;
    }

    [HttpGet]
    public ActionResult<IEnumerable<Article>> Get()
    {
        var articles = _articleService.GetAllArticles();
        return Ok(articles);
    }

    [HttpGet("{id}")]
    public ActionResult<Article> Get(int id)
    {
        var article = _articleService.GetArticleById(id);
        if (article == null)
            return NotFound();
        return Ok(article);
    }
}

Step 4: Test the API
Run the application and navigate to the appropriate API endpoints, for example:
    GET /api/articles: Retrieve all articles.
    GET /api/articles/{id}: Retrieve an article by its ID.

Remember, this example focuses on setting up a simple ASP.NET Core Web API project with Dependency Injection. For a complete production-ready solution, you'd need to consider error handling, validation, authentication, and other aspects.
Conclusion

We explored the concepts of Dependency Injection (DI) and demonstrated how to integrate DI into an ASP.NET Core Web API project. Dependency Injection is a powerful design pattern that promotes loosely coupled components, better testability, and maintainability. Here's a recap of what we covered:

1. Dependency Injection (DI)
DI is a design pattern that focuses on providing the dependencies a class needs from the outside, rather than creating them internally. This promotes modularity, reusability, and easier testing.

2. Advantages of DI

  • Loose Coupling: Components are decoupled, making it easier to replace or update individual parts without affecting the whole system.
  • Testability Dependencies can be easily mocked or replaced during testing, leading to more effective unit testing.
  • Maintainability: Changes to dependencies can be managed more centrally, making maintenance and updates simpler.


3. Integration with ASP.NET Core Web API

  • We created a simple ASP.NET Core Web API project.
  • We defined a service interface (IArticleService) and an implementation (ArticleService) to manage articles.
  • We configured the dependency injection container in the Startup.cs file using the AddScoped method.
  • We created an API controller (ArticlesController) that uses the IArticleService through constructor injection.

4. Testing the API
We ran the application and tested the endpoints using tools like Postman or a web browser.
We observed how the API endpoints interact with the injected service to provide data.

Dependency Injection is a fundamental concept in modern software development, and integrating it into your projects can lead to more maintainable, testable, and scalable applications. As you continue your journey in software development, these principles will prove to be valuable tools in your toolkit.


Tags: , ,
Categories:
Actions: E-mail | Kick it! | Permalink | commentComments (0) | RSS comment feedComment RSS

About HostForLIFE.eu

HostForLIFE.eu is European Windows Hosting Provider which focuses on Windows Platform only. We deliver on-demand hosting solutions including Shared hosting, Reseller Hosting, Cloud Hosting, Dedicated Servers, and IT as a Service for companies of all sizes.

We have offered the latest Windows 2016 Hosting, ASP.NET Core 2.2.1 Hosting, ASP.NET MVC 6 Hosting and SQL 2017 Hosting.


Tag cloud

Sign in

Powered by BlogEngine.NET 1.5.0.7 | Original Design by Arcsin, Adapted by RazorAnt