European ASP.NET 4.5 Hosting BLOG

BLOG about ASP.NET 4, ASP.NET 4.5 Hosting and Its Technology - Dedicated to European Windows Hosting Customer

Free ASP.NET 4.5.2 Cloud Germany Hosting - HostForLIFE.eu :: How to download a file in ASP.NET using C#.NET?

clock May 23, 2014 07:51 by author Peter

I am going to write about ASP.NET by using the following simple code snippet page you can download any type of file in ASP.NET 4.5.2 Cloud Hosting using C#.NET. Please observe the steps in the following code to know how the 'file downloading process' is happening.

FileManagement.aspx

<%@ Page Language="C#" %>
<!DOCTYPE html>
<script runat="server">
    protected void Page_Load(object sender, EventArgs e)
    {
        var fullFilePath = @"D:\Krish\gallery (1).jpg";
        DownloadFile(fullFilePath, System.IO.Path.GetFileName(fullFilePath));
    } 
    private void DownloadFile(string fullFilePhysicalPath, string downloadbleFileName)
    {
        // Create New instance of FileInfo
        System.IO.FileInfo file = new System.IO.FileInfo(fullFilePhysicalPath);
       // Checking if file exists
        if (file.Exists)
        {
           // Clear the content of the response
            Response.ClearContent();
            // Add the file name and attachment
            Response.AddHeader("Content-Disposition", "attachment; filename=" + downloadbleFileName);
            // Add the file size into the response header
           Response.AddHeader("Content-Length", file.Length.ToString()); 
            // Set the ContentType
            Response.ContentType = GetFileExtension(file.Extension.ToLower());
            // Write the file into the response 
            // ASP.NET 2.0 – TransmitFile
            // ASP.NET 1.1 – WriteFile
            Response.TransmitFile(file.FullName); 
            // End the response
            Response.End();          
        }
    }
    private string GetFileExtension(string fileExtension)
    {
        switch (fileExtension)
        {
            case ".htm":
            case ".html":
            case ".log":
                return "text/HTML";
            case ".txt":
                return "text/plain";
            case ".doc":
                return "application/ms-word";
            case ".tiff":
            case ".tif":
                return "image/tiff";
            case ".asf":
                return "video/x-ms-asf";
            case ".avi":
                return "video/avi";
            case ".zip":
                return "application/zip";
            case ".xls":
            case ".csv":
                return "application/vnd.ms-excel";
            case ".gif":
                return "image/gif";
            case ".jpg":
            case "jpeg":
                return "image/jpeg";
           case ".bmp":
                return "image/bmp";
            case ".wav":
                return "audio/wav";
            case ".mp3":
                return "audio/mpeg3";
            case ".mpg":
            case "mpeg":
                return "video/mpeg";
            case ".rtf":
                return "application/rtf";
            case ".asp":
                return "text/asp";
            case ".pdf":
                return "application/pdf";
            case ".fdf":
                return "application/vnd.fdf";
            case ".ppt":
                return "application/mspowerpoint";
            case ".dwg":
                return "image/vnd.dwg";
            case ".msg":
                return "application/msoutlook";
            case ".xml":
            case ".sdxl":
                return "application/xml";
            case ".xdp":
                return "application/vnd.adobe.xdp+xml";
            default:
                return "application/octet-stream";
        }
    }

</script>

<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head runat="server">
    <title></title>
</head>
<body>
    <form id="form1" runat="server">
    </form>
</body>
</html>



HostForLIFE.eu offers €1.29/month Affordable and High Performance Windows & ASP.NET Shared Hosting Plan

clock May 20, 2014 11:50 by author Peter

European Windows and ASP.NET hosting specialist, HostForLIFE.eu, has officially launched the new Windows & ASP.NET Shared Hosting Plan offered from as low as €1.29/month only. This LITE Windows & ASP.NET Hosting packages combine generous or 1 website, 1 GB disk space, 10 GB bandwidth, Support UTF-8 Domains, Dedicated Pool, etc. As the market for hosted solutions continues to grow, the new hosting range is designed to exceed the growing technical demands of businesses and IT professionals.

HostForLIFE.eu  is confident that their new LITE shared hosting plans will surely appeal to the personal across the world, besides the website owners and companies owning websites. The new web hosting plans will meet the requirement of high performance web hosting where one can easily update the content of a website on a regular basis. This plan is designed more for the web hobbiest needing affordable, high availability, hosting and easy backend management of windows and ASP.NET with powerful Plesk control panel.

Every day thousands of people decide to set up a website for business or personal use. New business owners and the average consumer don’t always have access to unlimited budgets. HostForLIFE.eu understand the importance of reliable hosting but are not always prepared to pay the exorbitant prices that reliable hosts charge.

For additional information about LITE Shared Hosting Plan offered by HostForLIFE.eu, please visit http://hostforlife.eu

About HostForLIFE.eu:

HostForLIFE.eu is European Windows Hosting Provider which focuses on Windows Platform only. HostForLIFE.eu  deliver on-demand hosting solutions including Shared hosting, Reseller Hosting, Cloud Hosting, Dedicated Servers, and IT as a Service for companies of all sizes.

HostForLIFE.eu is awarded Top No#1 SPOTLIGHT Recommended Hosting Partner by Microsoft (see www.microsoft.com/web/hosting/HostingProvider/Details/953). Their service is ranked the highest top #1 spot in several European countries, such as: Germany, Italy, Netherlands, France, Belgium, United Kingdom, Sweden, Finland, Switzerland and other European countries. Besides this award, They have also won several awards from reputable organizations in the hosting industry and the detail can be found on their official website.



Free ASP.NET 4.5 Cloud Hosting Spain - HostForLIFE.eu :: Count Number of Nodes in XML File in ASP.NET 4.5

clock May 6, 2014 06:00 by author Peter

Here I will explain how to count number of records in xml file in C# using ASP.NET 4.5 Cloud Hosting Spain or how to count number of nodes in xml file in asp.net using C# and VB.NET or count number of elements in xml file in C#.

In previous articles I explained insert xml data to sql table using stored procedure, Bind xml data to dropdown/gridview in asp.net, create online poll system with percentage graphs in asp.net and many articles relating to xml, Gridview, SQL, jQuery,asp.net, C#,VB.NET. Now I will explain how to count number of records in xml file in C# using ASP.NET.

To count number of nodes from xml file we need to write the code like as shown below

XmlDocument readDoc = new XmlDocument();
readDoc.Load(MapPath("Sample.xml"));
int count = readDoc.SelectNodes("CommentsInformation/Comments").Count;
lblcount.InnerHtml = "Number of Records: "+ count;

If you want to see it in complete example we need to write the code like as shown below
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
<title></title>
</head>
<body>
<form id="form1" runat="server">
<div>
<table>
<tr>
<td style="width: 100px">
Name:</td>
<td style="width: 100px">
<asp:TextBox ID="txtName" runat="server"></asp:TextBox></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="width: 100px">
Email:</td>
<td style="width: 100px">
<asp:TextBox ID="txtEmail" runat="server"></asp:TextBox></td>
</tr>
<tr><td></td>
<td>
<asp:Button ID="btnSubmit" runat="server" OnClick="btnSubmit_Click" Text="Submit" /></td>
</tr>
</table>
<br />
<label id="lblcount" runat="server" />
</div>
</form>
</body>
</html>

After that add XML file to your application and give name as "Sample.xml" then add root element in xml file otherwise it will through error. Here I added CommentInformation as root element in XML file.
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<CommentsInformation>
 </CommentsInformation>

After that add this namespace in codebehind

C# Code
using System;
using System.Xml;

After that add below code in code behind

protected void Page_Load(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
}
protected void btnSubmit_Click(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
XmlDocument xmldoc = new XmlDocument();
xmldoc.Load(Server.MapPath("Sample.xml"));
XmlElement parentelement = xmldoc.CreateElement("Comments");
XmlElement name = xmldoc.CreateElement("Name");
name.InnerText = txtName.Text;
XmlElement email = xmldoc.CreateElement("Email");
email.InnerText = txtEmail.Text;

parentelement.AppendChild(name);parentelement.AppendChild(email);
xmldoc.DocumentElement.AppendChild(parentelement);
xmldoc.Save(Server.MapPath("Sample.xml"));
XmlDocument readDoc = new XmlDocument();
readDoc.Load(MapPath("Sample.xml"));
int count = readDoc.SelectNodes("CommentsInformation/Comments").Count;
lblcount.InnerHtml = "Number of Records: "+ count;
}

VB.NET Code
Imports System.Xml
Partial Class vbcode
Inherits System.Web.UI.Page
Protected Sub Page_Load(ByVal sender As Object, ByVal e As EventArgs)
End Sub
Protected Sub btnSubmit_Click(ByVal sender As Object, ByVal e As EventArgs)
Dim xmldoc As New XmlDocument()
xmldoc.Load(Server.MapPath("Sample.xml"))
Dim parentelement As XmlElement = xmldoc.CreateElement("Comments")
Dim name As XmlElement = xmldoc.CreateElement("Name")
name.InnerText = txtName.Text
Dim email As XmlElement = xmldoc.CreateElement("Email")
email.InnerText = txtEmail.Text
parentelement.AppendChild(name)
parentelement.AppendChild(email)
xmldoc.DocumentElement.AppendChild(parentelement)
xmldoc.Save(Server.MapPath("Sample.xml"))
Dim readDoc As New XmlDocument()
readDoc.Load(MapPath("Sample.xml"))
Dim count As Integer = readDoc.SelectNodes("CommentsInformation/Comments").Count
lblcount.InnerHtml = "Number of Records: " & count
End Sub
End Class



Free ASP.NET 4.5 Hosting Spain - HostForLIFE.eu :: ASP.NET Validation Controls.

clock April 29, 2014 09:01 by author Peter

Today I will discuss about the various validation control that ASP.NET Hosting provide and benefit of using it over client side validation. ASP.NET validation control provide two ways validation. i.e. both Server side and Client side. They perform client-side validation if after confirming that browser allows client side validation(i.e JavaScript is enabled), thereby reducing the overhead of round trip. If client side validation is disabled, it will perform the server side validation. All this from detection to validation is all taken care by the ASP.NET.

In total ASP.NET provide 5 + 1(ValidationSummary) validation control:

  1. RequiredFieldValidator 
  2. CompareValidator
  3. CustomValidator
  4. RangeValidator
  5. RegularExpressionValidator 
  6. ValidationSummary Control      

will discuss about all the control in detail, but before that i will elaborate the attributes that are common to all the controls. 

1. Display - This attribute is used to display the error message. It takes 3 options

  • None: This will ensure that no error message is displayed. Used when Validation summary is used.
  • Static: This will ensure that space on the  page is reserved even if validation pass. i.e. Real estate area on the page will be allocated.
  • Dynamic: This will ensure that space for error message is reserved only if validation fails.

In short static and dynamic do exactly the same thing. Difference between them is that in case of static Style for the <span> is

style="visibility: hidden; color: red;"

and in case of Dynamic Style for span is

style="display: none; color: red;"

2. ControlToValidate - This attribute is used to get the control on which validation is to applied
3. EnableClientScript - Boolean value to indicate whether client- side validation is enabled or not. Default value is true.
4. IsValid - Boolean value to indicate whether the control mention is ControlToValidate attribute is valid or not. Default value is true.
5. Enabled - Boolean valued to indicate if Validation control is enabled or not. Default value is true.
6. ErrorMessage - This is the text message that will be displayed in the validation summary.

RequiredFieldValidator Control
As the name suggest, this validation control make sure that control mention in ControlToValidate cannot be empty.
<asp:TextBox ID="txtSampleTextBox" runat="server">
</asp:TextBox>
<asp:RequiredFieldValidator ID="reqfldValidator" runat="server" ControlToValidate="txtSampleTextBox" 
Enabled="true" Display="Dynamic" ErrorMessage="Required" ToolTip="Required">
*</asp:RequiredFieldValidator>

CompareValidator Control
This Control is used to compare the value or one control to the value of another control or to a fixed value. One catch here is that validation pass if both the fields are empty. To handle that one require to apply Required field validator along with CompareValidator.
<asp:TextBox ID="TextBox1" runat="server" />
<asp:TextBox ID="txtTextBox2" runat="server" />
<asp:CompareValidator ID="CompareValidator1" runat="server" ControlToValidate="txtTextBox1" ControlToCompare="txtTextBox2" Display="Dynamic" ValidationGroup="MyGroup" ToolTip="No Match">*</asp:CompareValidator>

ControlToCompare - This take the Id of control with which comparison is being done.
Comparison can be made on following data types: Currency, Date, Double, Integer and String

RangeValidator
As the name suggest this control is used to make sure that data entered by the user fall within the specified range. Again as for Compare validator validation will pass if input control is empty. Use RequiredFieldValidator to fix this issue.
<asp:TextBox ID="TextBox1" runat="server" ValidationGroup="MyGroup" />
<asp:RangeValidator ID="RangeValidator1" runat="server" ControlToValidate="txtTextBox1" MaximumValue="800"
MinimumValue="5" ValidationGroup="MyGroup" Display="Dynamic" Type="String" ToolTip="Error">*</asp:RangeValidator>

A little explanation for this validator. It has a Type attribute that signifies the datatype for Range. In above example datatype is string with MinimumValue="5" and MaximumValue="100". The validation goes like it will accept all the value that satisfy the regex ^[5-8]+$. A little confusing but will get clear after 2 3 reading.

RegularExpressionValidator
This is one of my favorite validator control. This control provide maximum level of flexibility to the developer and almost all the validator control function can be achieved using this validator control. RegularExpressionValidator control has attribute ValidationExpression that is used to specify the regular expression that is used to validate the input control.

<asp:TextBox ID="TextBox1" runat="server" ValidationGroup="MyGroup" />
<asp:RegularExpressionValidator ID="RegularExpressionValidator1" runat="server"  

ControlToValidate="txtTextBox1"
ValidationGroup="MyGroup" Display="Dynamic" ValidationExpression="^[5-8]+$" ToolTip="Error">*</asp:RegularExpressionValidator>

CustomValidator Control: Custom validator control is used to capture the validation that cannot be handled by the validator controls provided by ASP.NET. Here user is at the freedom to define his own custom method, both Client side and Server side. 
<asp:TextBox ID="TextBox1" runat="server" ValidationGroup="MyGroup" />
<asp:CustomValidator runat="server" ClientValidationFunction="YouClientValidationFunction" ControlToValidate="txtTextBox1" ID="cstmValidatorControl" OnServerValidate="ServerSideMethod" ValidateEmptyText="true" ToolTip="Error">*</asp:CustomValidator>

ValidateEmptyText  is a boolean attribute that if set to true, the input control will be validated even if it is empty.
ClientValidationFunction contains name of client validation function.
OnServerValidate contains name of server validation function.

ValidationSummary Control
This control is used to display the list of all the validation error that has occurred on the page. The error message displayed is the one set for the ErrorMessage attribute of the validation control. No error message will be displayed if this attribute is not set.  
<asp:TextBox ID="TextBox1" runat="server" ValidationGroup="MyGroup" />
<asp:RegularExpressionValidator ID="RegularExpressionValidator1" runat="server" ControlToValidate="txtTextBox1" ValidationGroup="MyGroup" Display="Dynamic" ValidationExpression="^[5-8]+$" ErrorMessage="Error" ToolTip="Error">*</asp:RegularExpressionValidator>

<asp:Button runat="server" ID="Button1" ValidationGroup="MyGroup" Text="Submit" />
<asp:ValidationSummary runat="server" ID="ValidationSummary1" ShowMessageBox="true" ValidationGroup="MyGroup" ShowSummary="true" DisplayMode="BulletList" />

DisplayMode has three options List, BulletList and SingleParagraph
ShowMessageBox when set to true will display the error as a alert popup
ShowSummary will display the error on the page. By default it is true.



Free Italy ASP.NET 4.5 Hosting - HostForLIFE.eu :: Programmatically Clearing The ASP.NET Cache For Web Forms and MVC Pages

clock April 16, 2014 06:01 by author Peter

Page level caching for ASP.NET 4.5 web forms and MVC websites is pretty awesome, because it allows you to implement something that's quite complex; multilevel caching, without having to really understand too much about caching, or even write much code. But what if you want to clear a cached ASP.net page before it's due to expire.

What page caching aims to achieve

When developers turn to caching pages in their ASP.net websites, usually it's because of one thing; the need for speed. When our code bases start to require continual requests to a data store, be it disk or database, that doesn't change too much overtime, caching is usually the first hammer we turn to to minimise fetching from slower stores. ASP.NET Web Forms and ASP.Net MVC both make this a pretty trivial thing to do by hiding the complexity of cache providers behind simple attributes to either your .aspx pages or controller actions:

WebForms page output caching example:

<%@ OutputCache Duration="300" VaryByParam="productId" %>
ASP.net MVC controller caching:
[OutputCache(Duration = 300, VaryByParam = "prodId")]
public ActionResult ProductDetails(string prodId)
{

}
}

The above is awesome because it's simplicity, but you'll notice one key thing here: I've set my cache expiry to 300 seconds. This is primarily because I want the content to pull from the source now and then just in case something has changed. I've used 300 seconds, but really the time may be inconsequential – I've just set it to an arbitrary number that I deemed would meet my needs.

This doesn't really use the cache as well as it could be used in many scenarios, the primary one being during a period where my site isn't being updated, and the content only changes once every few days/weeks/months. The .NET tooling attempts to allow for these situations by having support for providers like the SQLCacheDependency you can add to your application. But the SQL cache provider or even a CustomCacheProvider don't give you the fine grain control you really want: being able to programmatically remove page, control, action or child-action level cached pages. Like most great things: simple and elegant ASP.net does support this out of the box – you just don't hear about it much. You can tell the runtime to remove cached pages and controls simply by using a very simple recursive API that refers to it's relative URL.

// remove any webforms cached item with the wildcard default.aspx*
HttpResponse.RemoveOutputCacheItem("/default.aspx");
// just remove the webforms product page with the prodId=1234 param
HttpResponse.RemoveOutputCacheItem("/product.aspx?prodId=1234");
// remove my MVC controller action's output
HttpResponse.RemoveOutputCacheItem(Url.Action("details", "product", new { id = 1234 }));

You'll notice for the MVC page's cache reference I used the Url.Action helper, and I recommend this, as it uses the same MVC routing as the cache provider – usually taking the first route found. Using the Url.Action helper means your provided Url follows the same path in reverse to that of the cache provider. For MVC child actions there is currently no way that I know of clearing individual control's caches. MVC controller child actions are stored in the ChildActionCache. To clear the entire child action cache you can do the following:

OutputCacheAttribute.ChildActionCache = new MemoryCache("NewRandomStringNameToClearTheCache");

Obviously this is a pretty aggressive approach, but if you would like to do this in a more granular fashion, try the open source project MVC Doughnut caching instead.



HostForLIFE.eu Proudly Announces Microsoft SQL Server 2014 Hosting

clock April 7, 2014 09:58 by author Peter
HostForLIFE.eu was established to cater to an under served market in the hosting industry; web hosting for customers who want excellent service. HostForLIFE.eu a worldwide provider of hosting has announced the latest release of Microsoft's widely-used SQL relational database management system SQL Server Server 2014. You can take advantage of the powerful SQL Server Server 2014 technology in all Windows Shared Hosting, Windows Reseller Hosting and Windows Cloud Hosting Packages! In addition, SQL Server 2014 Hosting provides customers to build mission-critical applications and Big Data solutions using high-performance, in-memory technology across OLTP, data warehousing, business intelligence and analytics workloads without having to buy expensive add-ons or high-end appliances. 

SQL Server 2014 accelerates reliable, mission critical applications with a new in-memory OLTP engine that can deliver on average 10x, and up to 30x transactional performance gains. For Data Warehousing, the new updatable in-memory column store can query 100x faster than legacy solutions. The first new option is Microsoft SQL Server 2014 Hosting, which is available to customers from today. With the public release just last week of Microsoft’s latest version of their premier database product, HostForLIFE has been quick to respond with updated their shared server configurations.For more information about this new product, please visit http://hostforlife.eu/European-SQL-Server-2014-Hosting

About Us:
HostForLIFE.eu is awarded Top No#1 SPOTLIGHT Recommended Hosting Partner by Microsoft (see http://www.microsoft.com/web/hosting/HostingProvider/Details/953). Our service is ranked the highest top #1 spot in several European countries, such as: Germany, Italy, Netherlands, France, Belgium, United Kingdom, Sweden, Finland, Switzerland and other European countries. Besides this award, we have also won several awards from reputable organizations in the hosting industry and the detail can be found on our official website.


FREE ASP.NET 4.5 Spain Hosting – HostForLIFE.eu :: GridView and Export to Excel

clock March 29, 2014 18:18 by author Peter

This is very simple to implement in ASP.NET 4.5 Hosting. But, there are possibilities to get problems in exporting to excel from grid view. When you bind data to gridview and write some logic to export to excel then it will not be enough. We have to check or write some additional logic which will help us to solve the problems. Below is the explanation for all problems we may get in the complete process along with detailed solution. You may encounter below errors when you try to implement the export to excel for gridview.

Control of type "GridView" must be placed inside of the form tag with runat="server"
This is very well known error to ASP.NET developers and by seeing it, we think that the control is not inside the form with runat server. But this is not correct. This error will come even if we put the GridView inside form with runat server. The reason is, in the export to excel logic we are calling RenderControl() method of GridView. So, to render it without any issues we have to override the "VerifyRenderingInServerForm" in our code.  Below is the syntax of the event. Add this to the c# code in code behind file. Remember this event is a Page event means this method you should place in ASPX page. If you are using user control to implement this export to excel logic then below are the ways to go.

1. If your user control is using by less than 3-4 pages then go to each and every page and add this event to the page.

2. If your user control is using by more than 5 pages then the best solution is to create a base page [Which inherits from System.Web.UI.Page class] and all your ASPX pages should inherit from this base page.public override void VerifyRenderingInServerForm(Control control)  

{  
    //Confirms that an HtmlForm control is rendered for the specified ASP.NET   
    //server control at run time. 
}  

Now, after we added the event to page, the error will go away for sure. Even when you add the above code/event to the page, this is not enough if you have the paging, sorting enabled on gridview. If you enable paging or sorting then you encounter the below error.

"RegisterForEventValidation can only be called during Render();"

This error is coming because we are doing paging and sorting. If no paging or sorting enabled this error will not come. To resolve this error, please follow below steps.

1. In your export to excel button click event, first disable the paging, sorting on gridview and do data bind.
2. Call export to excel logic.
3. Re-enable paging, sorting on gridview and databind.

Below is the logic we have to use in export to excel button click event.

gvReport.AllowPaging = false;  
    gvReport.AllowSorting = false;  
    gvReport.DataBind();  
    ExportToExcel();//Method to use export to excel.  
    gvReport.AllowPaging = true;  
    gvReport.AllowSorting = false;  
    gvReport.DataBind();   

Now, you are clear with all errors and the logic will export all data in gridview to excel.

FYI, I am placing a sample of ExportToExcel() functionality here.

private void ExportToExcel()  
    {  
        Response.Clear();  
        Response.AddHeader("content-disposition", string.Format("attachment;filename=excel_report.xls"));  
        Response.Charset = ""; 
        // Response.Cache.SetCacheability(HttpCacheability.NoCache);  
        Response.ContentType = "application/vnd.xls";  
        System.IO.StringWriter stringWrite = new System.IO.StringWriter();  
        System.Web.UI.HtmlTextWriter htmlWrite = new HtmlTextWriter(stringWrite);  
        gvReport.RenderControl(htmlWrite);  
        Response.Write(stringWrite.ToString());  
        Response.End();  
    } 

Note: gvReport is the gridview control name in my example. And there are lot of posts in internet guide you incorrect to resolve the above error. For example, they will say set EnableEventValidation="false" in the <%@ Page directive Or disable validation in web.config level to resolve the error. Please do not set it.



European FREE ASP.NET MVC Hosting Netherlands - HostForLIFE.eu :: How to Custom Error Pages In ASP.NET MVC

clock March 20, 2014 07:00 by author Peter

If you're having problems setting up custom error pages in ASP.NET MVC you're not alone. It's surprisingly difficult to do this correctly, not helped by the fact that some errors are handled by ASP.NET and others by IIS.Ideally (and I expect such is the case with some other frameworks/servers) we would just configure our custom error pages in one place and it would just work, no matter how/where the error was raised. Something like:

<customErrors mode="On">

    <error code="404" path="404.html" />

    <error code="500" path="500.html" />

</customErrors>

Custom 404 error pages

When a resource does not exist (either static or dynamic) we should return a 404 HTTP status code. Ideally we should return something a little friendlier to our site visitors than the error pages built in to ASP.NET/IIS, perhaps offering some advice on why the resource may not exist or providing an option to search the site.

<!DOCTYPE html>

<html lang="en">

<head>

    <meta charset="utf-8"/>

    <title>404 Page Not Found</title>

</head>

<body>

    <h1>404 Page Not Found</h1>

</body>

</html>

I created a new ASP.NET MVC 5 application using the standard template in Visual Studio. If I run the site and try to navigate to a resource that does not exist e.g. /foo/bar, I'll get the standard ASP.NET 404 page with the following information:

Server Error in '/' Application.

The resource cannot be found.

Description: HTTP 404. The resource you are looking for (or one of its dependencies) could have been removed, had its name changed, or is temporarily unavailable.  Please review the following URL and make sure that it is spelled correctly.

Requested URL: /foo/bar

Version Information: Microsoft .NET Framework Version:4.0.30319; ASP.NET Version:4.0.30319.33440

In this case the error was raised by ASP.NET MVC because it could not find a matching controller and/or action that matched the specified URL. In order to set up a custom 404 error page add the following to web.config inside <system.web></system.web>:

<customErrors mode="On">

  <error statusCode="404" redirect="~/404.html"/>

</customErrors>

I've set mode="On" so we can view the custom errors pages locally. Generally you would only want to display these in production so would set mode="RemoteOnly".

Now if I navigate to /foo/bar once more I see my custom error page. However, the URL is not /foo/bar as I'd expect. Instead ASP.NET issued a redirect to /404.html?aspxerrorpath=/foo/bar. Also if I check the HTTP status code of the response, it's 200 (OK).

This is very wrong indeed. Not only is is misleading as we're returning a 200 response when a resource does not exist, but it's also bad for SEO. Quite simply, if a resource does not exist at the specified URL you should return a 404 or redirect to a new location if the resource has moved. To fix this we can change ASP.NET's default behaviour of redirecting to the custom error page to rewrite the response:

<customErrors mode="On" redirectMode="ResponseRewrite">

  <error statusCode="404" redirect="~/404.html"/>

</customErrors>

Unfortunately this doesn't help us much. Although the original URL is now preserved, ASP.NET still returns a 200 response and furthermore displays our custom error page as plain text. To fix the incorrect content type we have to return an ASP.NET page. So if you thought that you'd never have to deal with *.aspx pages again, I'm sorry to dissapoint you.

After renaming the error page to 404.aspx and updating web.config accordingly, the URL is preserved and we get the correct content type (text/html) in the response.

However, we still get a HTTP 200 response. We therefore need to add the following to the top of 404.aspx:

<% Response.StatusCode = 404 %>

We now get the correct status code, URL preserved and our custom error page. If we navigate to a static resource (e.g. foo.html) or a URL that doesn't match our routing configuration (e.g. /foo/bar/foo/bar) we get the standard IIS 404 error page. In the above scenarios ASP.NET is bypassed and IIS handles the request. Also if you happen to be returning HttpNotFound() from your controller actions you'll get the same result - this is because MVC simply sets the status code rather than throwing an exception, leaving IIS to do its thing. In these cases we need to set up custom error pages in IIS (note that this only works in IIS 7+). In web.config add the following inside <system.webServer></system.webServer>:

<httpErrors errorMode="Custom">

  <remove statusCode="404"/>

  <error statusCode="404" path="/404.html" responseMode="ExecuteURL"/>

</httpErrors>

Similar to ASP.NET custom errors I've set errorMode="Custom" so we can test the error page locally. Normally you'd want this set to errorMode="DetailedLocalOnly".

Also note that I'm using a html page again, not aspx. Ideally you should always use simple static files for your error pages. This way if there's something wrong with ASP.NET you should still be able to display your custom error pages. If we navigate to a static file that does not exist we now get our custom error page instead of the default IIS one. However if we look at the response headers we get a 200 status code, not 404; just like the problem we had with ASP.NET's custom errors (hey, at least the IIS and ASP.NET teams are consistent).

Fortunately IIS actually provides a built in solution to resolve this rather than having to rely on hacks. If you set responseMode="File" IIS will return your custom errors page without altering the original response headers:

<error statusCode="404" path="404.html" responseMode="File"/>

Custom 500 error pages

Most of the issues addressed above relate to other error pages so if you use the same techniques you should be able to set up a custom "500 Server Error" page. There are however a few caveats.

The standard ASP.NET MVC template sets up the built in HandleErrorAttribute as a global filter. This captures any error thrown in the ASP.NET MVC pipeline and returns a custom "Error" view providing you have custom errors enabled in web.config. It will look for this view at ~/views/{controllerName}/error.cshtml or ~/views/shared/error.cshtml.

If you're using this filter you'll need to either update the existing view with your custom error page HTML or create the view if it doesn't already exist (best to do so in the views/shared directory).

Personally, I don't really see the value in this filter. Any exceptions thrown outside of the MVC pipeline will fall back to the standard ASP.NET error pages configuration. Since you're going to have to set those up anyway there is no real need to have the filter.

To do so add the following to the ASP.NET custom error pages configuration:

   <customErrors mode="On" redirectMode="ResponseRewrite">

     <error statusCode="404" redirect="~/404.aspx"/>

     <error statusCode="500" redirect="~/500.aspx"/>

   </customErrors>

Like before I created an ASPX page that sets the response code:

<% Response.StatusCode = 500 %>

<!DOCTYPE html>

<html lang="en">

<head>

    <meta charset="utf-8" />

    <title>500 Server Error</title>

</head>

<body>

    <h1>500 Server Error</h1>

</body>

</html>

Unfortunately this won't capture every exception you're likely to encounter in your application. A fairly common error is produced by ASP.NET's request validation, for example requesting a URL with a dangerous path such as /foo/bar<script></script>. This will actually produce a 400 (Bad Request) response so you can either add a specific error page for this or set up a default like so:

<customErrors mode="Off" redirectMode="ResponseRewrite" defaultRedirect="~/500.aspx">

<error statusCode="404" redirect="~/404.aspx"/>

<error statusCode="500" redirect="~/500.aspx"/>

</customErrors>

Finally to capture any non ASP.NET exceptions we can set up an IIS custom error page for server errors:

   <error statusCode="500" path="500.html" responseMode="File"/>



ASP.NET Hosting - Belgium - HostForLIFE.eu :: Basic Authentication with ASP.NET Web API Using Authentication Filter

clock March 10, 2014 07:42 by author Peter

Authorization filters and action filters have been around for a while in ASP.NET Web API but there is this new authentication filter introduced in Web API 2. Authentication filters have their own place in the ASP.NET Web API pipeline like other filters. Historically, authorization filters have been used to implement authentication and there is ton of samples out there with all kinds of authentication implemented in authorization filters. Web API 2 introduces the authentication filter so that authentication concerns can be separated out of authorization filter and put into an authentication filter.

This blog post is just a quick introduction to writing a custom authentication filter for implementing HTTP Basic Authentication. There is a full-blown example here, if you are interested in writing a production-strength filter.First up, we create the filter class BasicAuthenticator implementing the IAuthenticationFilter interface. We also derive from Attribute so that we can apply the filter on action methods, like so.

public class EmployeesController : ApiController
{
    [BasicAuthenticator(realm: "Magical")]
    public HttpResponseMessage Get(int id)
    {
        return Request.CreateResponse<Employee>(
        new Employee()
        {
            Id = id,
            FirstName = "Johnny",
            LastName = "Law"
        });
    }
}

There are two interesting methods that we need to implement in the filter – (1) AuthenticateAsync and (2) ChallengeAsync.

AuthenticateAsync contains the core authentication logic. If authentication is successful, context.Prinicipal is set. Otherwise, context.ErrorResult is set to UnauthorizedResult, which basically gets translated to a “401 – Unauthorized” HTTP response status code.

public class BasicAuthenticator : Attribute, IAuthenticationFilter
{
    private readonly string realm;
    public bool AllowMultiple { get { return false; } }
 
    public BasicAuthenticator(string realm)
    {
        this.realm = "realm=" + realm;
    }
 
    public Task AuthenticateAsync(HttpAuthenticationContext context,
                                  CancellationToken cancellationToken)
    {
        var req = context.Request;
        if (req.Headers.Authorization != null &&
                req.Headers.Authorization.Scheme.Equals(
                          "basic", StringComparison.OrdinalIgnoreCase))
        {
            Encoding encoding = Encoding.GetEncoding("iso-8859-1");
            string credentials = encoding.GetString(
                                  Convert.FromBase64String(
                                      req.Headers.Authorization
                                                   .Parameter));
            string[] parts = credentials.Split(':');
            string userId = parts[0].Trim();
            string password = parts[1].Trim();
 
            if (userId.Equals(password)) // Just a dumb check
            {
                var claims = new List<Claim>()
                {
                    new Claim(ClaimTypes.Name, "badri")
                };
                var id = new ClaimsIdentity(claims, "Basic");
                var principal = new ClaimsPrincipal(new[] { id });
                context.Principal = principal;
            }
        }
        else
        {
            context.ErrorResult = new UnauthorizedResult(
                     new AuthenticationHeaderValue[0],
                                          context.Request);
        }
 
        return Task.FromResult(0);
    }
 
    public Task ChallengeAsync(
                     HttpAuthenticationChallengeContext context,
                            CancellationToken cancellationToken) {}
}

For basic authentication, when there is a 401, we are supposed to send WWW-Authenticate header and the right place to write such challenge related logic will be the ChallengeAsync method. This is where things get interesting because it is not so straight forward to add headers here. The recommended approach is to create a class implementing IHttpActionResult and set an instance of it to context.Result, like so.

public Task ChallengeAsync(HttpAuthenticationChallengeContext context,
                                      CancellationToken cancellationToken)
{
    context.Result = new ResultWithChallenge(context.Result, realm);
    return Task.FromResult(0);
}

Here is the result class. The crux of this class is in the ExecuteAsync method and that is where we set the WWW-Authenticate response header indicating the scheme and the realm.

public class ResultWithChallenge : IHttpActionResult
{
    private readonly IHttpActionResult next;
    private readonly string realm;
 
    public ResultWithChallenge(IHttpActionResult next, string realm)
    {
        this.next = next;
        this.realm = realm;
    }
 
    public async Task<HttpResponseMessage> ExecuteAsync(
                                CancellationToken cancellationToken)
    {
        var res = await next.ExecuteAsync(cancellationToken);
        if (res.StatusCode == HttpStatusCode.Unauthorized)
        {
            res.Headers.WwwAuthenticate.Add(
               new AuthenticationHeaderValue("Basic", this.realm));
        }
 
        return res;
    }
}

For setting the WWW-Authenticate response header, we created a class. However, it is possible to get away without creating one, like this.

public Task ChallengeAsync(HttpAuthenticationChallengeContext context,
                               CancellationToken cancellationToken)
{
    var result = await context.Result.ExecuteAsync(cancellationToken);
    if (result.StatusCode == HttpStatusCode.Unauthorized)
    {
        result.Headers.WwwAuthenticate.Add(
                new AuthenticationHeaderValue(
                    "Basic", "realm=" + this.realm));
    }
    context.Result = new ResponseMessageResult(result);
}

However, this approach will not work with MVC since there is no ResponseMessageResult. For the sake of consistency, it is better to create our own class. Also, the code above changes the pipeline behavior slightly. For these reasons, it is recommended to create a class implementing IAuthenticationFilter (the initial approach in this post).



ASP.NET 4.5.1 Germany Hosting - HostForLIFE.eu :: ASP.NET Session and Concurrent Access

clock March 5, 2014 05:35 by author Peter

In one of my projects I found some a strange at first sight issue related to concurrent Session usages. During one long request the other parallel requests were waiting until the previous one is finished.This issue occurs when user tries to download file from ashx-handler. Handler requires Session to get some user-related configuration which is stored there. I've tried to dig deeper and that what I've found. By default no concurrent access to the asp.net session state is allowed. Requests with same SessionID will be locked exclusively to prevent potential corruption of its state. This topic contains only brief information about ASP.NET, if you want to be more familiar with ASP.NET, you should try HostForLife.eu

When you have request1 `in progress` and trying to do request2 - Session object will be locked by request1 and our code in request2 will be waiting for request1 completed. ASP.NET Session is thread safe and synchronization mechanism is based on System.Threading.ReaderWriterLock. This means that we can do many reads but only one writing at the same time. ASP.NET Session object is configured for full (read\write) access, by default. That's why we need to configure Session object as 'read-only' on long-term pages to have non-blocking access to Session object from other pages. Be aware that even you don't use Session object explicitly you have this issue too.

How to reproduce

To reproduce this issue let's create 2 asp.net pages.

Default page:

<%@ Page Language="C#" %>

<script runat="server">
  protected void Page_Load(object sender, EventArgs e)
  {
      Response.Write("Hello, SessionId " + Session.SessionID);
  }
</script>

Slow page (contains some long-term execution):

<%@ Page Language="C#" %>

<script runat="server">
    protected void Page_Load(object sender, EventArgs e)
    {
        System.Threading.Thread.Sleep(10000);
        Response.Write("Hello, SessionId " + Session.SessionID);
    }
</script>

web.config

<configuration>
  <system.web>
    <sessionState mode="InProc"/>
  </system.web>
</configuration>

To resolve this issue we can re-configure ASP.NET Session object access. Session state is configured by using the sessionState element of the system.web configuration section. If you need non-blocking access to read from Session:

<%@ Page Language="C#" EnableSessionState="ReadOnly"%>

If you don't need Session:

<%@ Page Language="C#" EnableSessionState="False"%>



About HostForLIFE.eu

HostForLIFE.eu is European Windows Hosting Provider which focuses on Windows Platform only. We deliver on-demand hosting solutions including Shared hosting, Reseller Hosting, Cloud Hosting, Dedicated Servers, and IT as a Service for companies of all sizes.

We have offered the latest Windows 2016 Hosting, ASP.NET Core 2.2.1 Hosting, ASP.NET MVC 6 Hosting and SQL 2017 Hosting.


Tag cloud

Sign in